Advertise with Us

 

 

Home > Weekly Column

THE MORE YOU LOOK AT THE AMNESTY BILL, THE WORSE IT LOOKS.

May 29, 2006 - June 5, 2006
Last week the U.S. Senate passed an immigration reform bill that supporters insist is not “amnesty,” even though those who have illegally entered our country, illegally worked in our country, and in most cases committed criminal acts to cover up their illegal activity, are completely forgiven. By any logical definition of the term “amnesty”, that is exactly what the Senate has passed.

But the immigration reform bill does much more damage to our national interests than merely granting amnesty to millions of criminals. For example, the “shamnesty” plan also includes provisions which:

*Allow illegals to attend college at in-state tuition rates. If your own son or daughter attends college in Alabama or Mississippi next fall they will be socked with additional fees far in excess of what illegals residing in those states will pay. Crossing a state line results in financial punishment for American citizens, yet those who illegally cross our national border are rewarded.

*Illegals who committed identity theft to cover-up their illegal work in this country get to keep the benefits of their crime by collecting social security payments “earned” during their criminal activity. In other words, the U.S. Senate would let a burglar break into your home and steal your television, then give him amnesty for the crime AND let him keep the television set as a bonus. What a country!

*Illegals employed in the agricultural industry cannot be fired except for “just cause.” American citizens in the same industry do not have the same job protection. Illegals must be paid the “prevailing wage;” but no such guarantee extends to all American workers. Shouldn’t American citizens at least be provided the same rights as criminals?

*Supporters of the legislation claim that illegals must pay all the taxes they owe to get on track for citizenship. But that is simply not true. Illegals must pay a $3200 fine over eight years and then only have to pay taxes for three out of the five years they illegally worked here. I am sure most American citizens would like the same courtesy. Just let us pay $3200 and then choose which three years out of five that we will pay taxes. Sign me up today!! Employers of illegals are also not liable for any taxes they failed to pay in connection with the illegal labor they brought to this country.

*Finally, Senate leaders claim that they are committed to “securing our borders.” But a last-minute amendment requires consultation with the Mexican government before construction of any additions to the border fence that only covers about 25% of our 2000 mile border with Mexico. This essentially gives Mexico veto power over any efforts to expand our border security.

The Senate immigration bill is over 600 pages long. It is a safe bet that most of the Senators who voted for it never read the entire bill. More Americans should. This could be the most destructive piece of legislation that has ever passed in the U.S. Senate. Unless the House puts a stop to this madness, generations of Americans will suffer dearly for their inattention to the details and their responsibilities to our nation.

###

Previous Column

A GLARING OMISSION. - May 15, 2006 - May 22, 2006
During President Bush’s prime time speech on immigration Monday night he threw out a lot of numbers. A 1,200 mile border with Mexico. 6,000 National Guardsmen who will patrol that border under his plan. 6,000 new Border Patrol agents who will be added over the next couple of years. Those are all very interesting numbers. But the most important number was ignored by the President: how many immigrants will be allowed into this country if we follow his lead?

A study conducted by the Herita...
GUMBEL'S GAFFE GETS HIM A PASS. - February 18, 2006 - February 25, 2006
Despite the nearly hysterical hype by NBC and the sporting world, most Americans have been tuning out of the Winter Olympics. Most television networks chose to air re-runs rather than challenging the expected viewing domination of the Olympics. But those who chose to go head to head with the Olympics have fared very well. “Grey’s Anatomy,” “Desperate Housewives,” and “American Idol” are among the shows that won the battle for viewers by huge margins.

Maybe it is because curling is th...
BIGGER POLITICAL SHIFT MAY LOOM. - February 6, 2006 - February 13, 2006
Last Friday Democrat State Senator Don McLeary announced he was switching to the Republican Party. Although Republicans already enjoyed a numerical majority in the State Senate, the move by McLeary gives the Republicans an even larger margin of 18-15 over the Democrats. That margin is, however, much more significant than the numbers themselves indicate.

First, despite Republicans gaining a 17-16 numerical majority following the 2004 elections (the first Republican majority in the State...
BEWARE OF BOGUS POLLS - January 8, 2006 - January 15, 2006
BEWARE OF BOGUS POLLS

As we enter into another election year, politicians at every level will seek our attention, votes and money…and not necessarily in that order. In addition to being inundated with television commercials, direct mail pieces, radio ads, and automated phone calls we will also be subjected to numerous polls.

Candidates use polls internally to determine which attacks, and responses to opponents’ attacks, are most effective in “moving” voters one direction or an...
IT IS CHRISTMAS, GET OVER IT! - December 1, 2005 - December 7, 2005
It’s become an annual ritual. Each December we engage in a fight for Christmas against those who wish to eliminate it from existence. Now, the Anti-Christmas Crowd (ACC) does not target the holiday itself. Billions of dollars in Christmas sales, and all the taxes that pour into government coffers with those sales, would be lost if the holiday was actually eliminated. No, they just want to rid the world of the word “Christmas” due to the presumably harmful religious connotations associated with...
READ THE ARCHIVE

Get Steve’s Daily Notes sent right to your inbox…

Name:
E-mail:
 
SHOULD PRESIDENT OBAMA PAY TRIBUTE TO THE VICTIMS OF 9-11 AT GROUND ZERO ON SEPTEMBER 11?
YES. HE IS THE PRESIDENT AND THAT IS WHERE HE SHOULD BE.
NO. IT WOULD INSULT THE MEMORY OF THOSE LOST FOR THE MOSQUE SUPPORTING PRESIDENT TO BE THERE.
IT DEPENDS ON WHAT HE SAYS AND DOES THERE.
PROBABLY, BUT HE WILL DODGE OUT. PROBABLY PLAY GOLF INSTEAD.
NOT SURE.
 
 

Previous Articles:

WILL DEMS DITCH A SENATE SEAT IN KANSAS TO PUT SEBELIUS AT HHS?
February 8, 2009 - February 15, 2009

DOES PRESIDENT OBAMA HATE WHITE PEOPLE?
February 1, 2009 - February 8, 2009

PARADE OF FOOLS DESCENDS ON WASHINGTON, D.C.
January 11, 2009 - January 18, 2009

READ THE ARCHIVES

Home | Biography | Photos | Speaking Requests | The Show | Bookshelf | Contact Us | Advertise | Meal Ticket | Steve Recommends | Steve Health Tips
Copyright (c) Gill Reports 2004. All rights reserved.
Created by: Archi Web